The Classics Challenge

The classics. It’s a term that gets bandied around quite a lot. Now we’ve spoken of literary snobs before but the literati seem to wax lyrical about the list of books all people should read. I realised that I have not read quite a few books on this list. Now don’t get me wrong I’m not a literary heathen. As I’ve mentioned previously I was a Shakespeare geek in high school, I have read some of the period romances from the Pride and Prejudice family, I have adventured through Middle Earth and have gone down the Rabbit hole with Alice. I have gone along with Homer’s Odyssey and have spent time with Anne of Green Gables. But there are many books I have not read.

This year I had set myself a challenge to read 50 books I already owned. Alas this has failed because I found way too many new books to buy and read along the way but did manage to get through 27 books I owned (and 16 I bought this year). So for next year’s reading challenge I am setting myself a more doable goal plus also appeasing the literati who seem disgusted that several so called classics have never met my eyes. But now the challenge begins as to which 10 I should read. And what makes a classic.

For some the period romances of Pride and Prejudice etc are classics. Personally I find them dull and have only managed to get through the afore mentioned Pride and Prejudice and Little Women and I began Sense and Sensibility but i was bored to tears. Don’t get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with these books but they are just not to my taste. I’m much more likely to read Sense Sensibility and Sea Monsters.

So far I have chosen a few and please don’t judge me for never have read these. I do won them all so I’ve intended to read them for several years but they have fallen by the wayside of new books.

First up is To Kill a Mockingbird. Everyone is appalled that as a writer I have not read this. I will be remedying this. I’ve also never seen the movie so going in with fresh mind and eyes.

Others include Watership Down, Lord of the Flies, War and Peace (this one is going to kill me i fear) and Anna Karenina. But now to pick the others.

So classics: Anyone have any suggestions of books everyone must read? And who wants to join me?

Published in: on December 7, 2011 at 3:37 am  Comments (3)  
Tags: , , , , , ,

The Baseball Theory

I should have called this blog the Onion theory, but it didn’t have the same ring to it. There’s a band called Will Haven who I used to listen to who had a song called Baseball Theory about how a baseball has many layers, and as you unravel it, there are different types of fillings. I believe the singer was talking about his relationship, but I’m here to talk about books and writing.

I’ve struggled with being able to write to a certain level. I don’t want to be on the same level as the thousand other writers out there trying to make it in the publishing world. I want to be deeper, or higher, or whatever the analogy would be. I want someone to read my work and know I’ve practised, put effort into honing my skills and that my ideas are unique and my characters are real and might actually be your neighbours or friends. I used to call these layers 2D and 3D, (this is a little insight to how my brain works when writing and it might sound crazy, but I can’t help it). If I write a character that is bland, with no discernable features and has no background and my story is lacklustre, I think to myself ‘that was too 2D.’ I need it to be more 3D. I need it to have layers, sides, depth and be realistic. It’s not enough to make a ‘father’ an alcoholic, or a ‘mother’ overbearing. It’s too clichéd and predictable. In my NaNo (National Novel Writers Month) I made the daughter deaf. She’s in one scene that goes for about two sentences, but I was able to make her more 3D. I wanted to add a character that was a late teen goth, but dreaded the thought of what stereotypical template I would write about a teen goth, so I tried really hard to try and unravel her ‘baseball.’ I didn’t want her to have black eyeliner or fingerless gloves or listen to Marilyn Manson. She writes a weekly blog, listens to Norwegian black metal and I made her talk about a boy she dated who was severely into the Occult and that he got a little too close to the supernatural and had disappeared.

I don’t want to overdo it and make every single character have a rich and meaningful/heartbreaking back story. Sometimes you can add a few layers by indicating things like smoking when they’re stressed, looking at junkies and being disgusted because their sister/brother died of an overdose. You don’t need to go in deep and reveal layer after layer, two or three is more than enough. Often, and I’m guilty of this too, I’m read entire books where the main character hasn’t the slightest depth at all. This happens in fantasy books often because the writer is too distracted with cool secondary characters and environments.  Take X-Men for example, who is the coolest, most badass x-men? Wolverine. Then who? Beast, Gambit, Jean Grey? Now look at the leader, Cyclops? All leaders are straight forward, square jawed with a simple power who has no flaws and are more annoying then enjoyable. This also happens with Images Cyberforce, Ripclaw was cool, Ballistic was cool and their leader, Stryker? Who cares? He has three arms on one side and a long blonde pony tail. Wolverine had a back story a mile long, he had several different comics going at the same time, but did they ever release a Cyclops comic? Nope. And if he did, would anyone have bought it?

When it came to team dynamics, there was always that formula of having one really, really large guy, example, (the Thing in Fantastic Four, Beast, Maul from WildC.A.T.s). The cool offsider  (Human Torch, Grifter), the slim and sexy female (Storm, Invisible Woman, Zealot). I say break this mould because it’s becoming tiresome and predictable, it stays two dimensional. I understand in the comic realm if you mirror something successful, you may get readers to come to your side for a carbon copy and then they’ll have two comics to read a month, instead of one.

Anyway, I’m getting off the point. Some characters always surprise me, and it’s always unintentional. I’ll write a side character needed for one chapter and I’ll like them so much I’ll bring them back into the story later on and give them a bigger role. Other characters that I try to build too much on become a struggle to write and I leave them. In the NaNo I’m writing now I have a character called Wickham who picks up one of the main characters (Fella Jack)  to drive him out to this massive hole they found. His whole purpose was to just have somebody tell him what they had done the night before when they were drunk and Fella Jack woke up on the front lawn. Wickham is stick thin with shoulder length blonde hair and he smokes and has an old car. That’s all the depth I gave him. He didn’t have any other purpose, but for some reason, I don’t know what it is, I like him. I want something to happen to him, get him involved. I gave Fella Jack’s wife a drinking problem (breaking my own rules, I know), she hates her daughter and leaves to go to bars to pick up other men. I thought her character was deep enough, but I haven’t been back to her since the first chapter and I’m 12 chapters in!

Sometimes unrevealing the baseball works, and other times just having it the way it is works too. You can never tell.

Mitchell Tierney

Resurfacing

 

The past few months I haven’t written. Not a word, not a sausage, not a damn thing. And at first I went a little stir-crazy and now, I’m just a bit lost.  Is this what happens when a village loses its chief idiot?

So why have I been sans-writing? Has there been a writing strike? Have I lost my marbles? Have I lost my pen? Have I crashed a laptop? For the love of all things decent, what, Sandy, what?

Nope. I’ve just not had the time. The last few months I’ve been a part-time student, full-time worker ant, and I’ve been in a play which has gone from intense to better start focussing and sorting yourself out, now! To the point where I’ve skipped some good opportunities to do many things in the public forum. My blogs stand neglected and abandoned with cobwebs growing all around them. And to be honest, it’s a little disheartening that there isn’t a regular audience clamouring for the next episode of my work…awkward.

So now, here is my challenge and the point to this, my first blog in months (how lucky do you feel right now) –how do I get back? Oh, don’t get me wrong, I want to get back to writing…sort of. And I have a lot of work I want to write. My biggest motivator for one of my novels was NaNoWriMo. The challenge of 50,000 words in 30 days is amazing. I won’t go into details, because there’s already a blog all about it, but damn it gets the blood pumping, doesn’t it? I even kept going with my work last year, after the due date, because I was enjoying writing it so much. Admittedly I wasn’t a part-time student, nor had many other art jobs going at the time, but still, there it was. And now, I see writing as my old friend. One I’m keen to be reacquainted with. I want to sit down, like I am right now, and have a cup of tea and maybe a warm cholesterol-inducing creamy scone and just get the words out of my heart, out of my mind, out through my fingers and onto something a bit more tangible. I want to do this. But right now, I’m just a little tired. I’m a little lost. I know where I want to go, but it’s just about trying to follow the path in the forest to my destination.

So, I’m going with the tried and true method. I’m putting on the music, I’m taking time out and I’m sitting down and writing. I think this time though, instead of jumping back into my stories like I used to do, I’m going to have to start a tiny bit slower. It’s like trying to move the rusty handle of something. You’ll need a little oil, and you’ll need to let it take it’s time. But wait, just wait a second and she’ll be back to her former glory in no time.

I’ve also had some personal things that have happened since I last wrote and it’s definitely coloured my experience of life in general. So right now, as much as I would like to write and forget all the hideous, grotesque bollocks that’s happened recently, I just need to relax and go with the flow.

And I think that’s what it’s about for me, at the moment. Different writers work differently. And depending where you are in life and in the world, your writing will be different. Right now, it’s reflective, so I can deal with everything. But when I’m feeling strong and awake enough I look forward to going back to some good old fashioned gothic action. It’s sort of like recovering from an illness. The fever has broken and I’m starting to get my appetite back. It’s going to be a little while before I feel like a rich meal, but right now, I’m getting my appetite back and it’s a good thing. I’m reconnecting.

I suppose the reason I’m writing this, is just to say that as writers we get impatient with ourselves. I especially do. When I have the time, but not the inspiration. When I have inspiration coming out of my ears and no time to write. When I have no idea what the hell I’m doing, but I’m doing it and loving it and racing along with it, not sure if I’ll land or crash and burn. But sometimes, just sometimes, whatever is out there, whatever life hauls at us, torsion catapult style, whatever hits the fan and whatever you’re left cleaning up afterwards, the thing with words is that they’re these beautiful things that don’t just entertain or amuse us, they sort us out. They help us deal. They help us cope. Sometimes they help us understand and sometimes they leave us questioning what the hell the author was smoking. But sometimes, just sometimes, instead of demanding that they do our bidding, instead of insisting that inspiration get its butt down here and help us because it’s the only day we will have in a long time, sometimes, it just pays to sit back, relax and go with the flow.

Believe me, as much as I have a tree-hugging hippie side to me and I love the ‘go with the flow’ notion, I’ve never really done it with my actual work. I’ve always had an agenda. I’ve always had somewhere I’ve wanted to go or something I’ve wanted to get out there. For instance, the genre, the type of story, the beginning of something. Sometimes even just one line. One line that starts that story for me, whether it’s beginning, middle or end. And the only time I’ve been reflective is when I’ve journalled and kept my thoughts to myself. But these days, I think I need to let the intense agenda go. I just need to go with the flow. I just need to write and see what happens. And maybe I’ll keep it and use it, maybe I’ll change it, and maybe I’ll keep it hidden for now and see when I’m ready to share it, if I ever am. The other thing that keeps cropping up for me is to let someone else into this world of mine. I’m a very private person when it comes to certain things in my life, most of us are. And there are a lot of people who wouldn’t believe that about me, because I come across as the warmest, friendliest, outgoing person who isn’t shy to talk to someone. But my closest friends who have known me much longer and have seen me at my worst and for some reason have still stuck around know this about me. I’m exceptionally shy. I’m terrified of letting someone into my most sacred world. And every day I slide into my little customer service mask, and pretend that I’m not shy. And every day it requires effort. But there are days when I just can’t deal with people. And there are days when I can’t be bothered trying, because I’m exhausted. Keeping up your defences every day does that to you. So why don’t I just relax and ‘go with the flow’ and let everyone in? Easy – because not everyone is respectful or tolerant. And lately I’ve had that reconfirmed. Writing for me isn’t just about slipping into different worlds, putting something completely fictional out there, entertaining myself and the world and leaving it be. It’s much more than that.

When I write, I’m letting you into a sacred area of my world, powered by the one thing I prize more than anything in the universe – imagination. I’m letting you into my world. I’m showing you what I see, what I feel, what I hear, what I think. And I’m trusting you with it. Sometimes it’s an exceptional risk and sometimes I don’t get involved in thinking about the type of person reading it. It’s too much to deal with, I don’t need that kind of pressure. Because at the end of the day this is my world. These are my characters. And you are a guest in my world. So, I write for me. But there is my world, and when I write I invite you into it. Because I’m curious, because I want to connect. I want you to see something. I want to show you something. On some level I hope we can understand each other. You don’t have to love it, you don’t ever have to read another thing I write, ever again. You don’t even have to finish reading what I’ve written.  And today, just today, I’m not going to worry about it. I’m not going to try and shape anything. I’m not going to try and impress you. I’m not going to try and entertain you. We’re not going to pretend that I’m not shy and I’m not unsure. Today, we’re just going to be honest with each other. Respectful, but honest. I’m not sure. I’m unbelievably shy. I’m doing something different and I’m trying something new. So here I am. My castle is unguarded and my defences are down around you. And I’m just going to sit back and see what happens.

So I tell you what. I’ll invite you in for a cup of tea and a few words, and in return I’ll let go. I’ll relax and I’ll go with the flow. And let’s just see where the evening takes us.

If this works, then all right. We’ve achieved something. If not, then screw it. It was a good experiment. But right now, while I’m trying to find my way back through the forest and the thickets, let’s just stop, check out the scenery, let it go and go with the flow.

 

~Sandy Sharma

 

 

 

Book vs Movie: The Golden Compass

Firstly this one is short but sweet. Secondly minor spoilers, you have been warned.

The Golden Compass (2007) movie is based on the first book in the His Dark Materials trilogy by Phillip Pullman, called Northern Lights. And I use the words ‘based on’ quite lightly. For those who have read the books and have not made the jump to see the film for the love of all things literary DON’T. It will anger you.

Now I hadn’t read the books when I went to see the movie and as such enjoyed the story of Lyra Belacqua and her dæmon Pan (a sort of familiar that take the shapes of animals) and her search for the missing Gyptian children across the snowy lands. The movie boasts stunning visual effects and is the only thing I still enjoy about the movie post book reading. Seeing the polar bears, especially armoured bear Iorek Byrnison  come to life was amazing.

The problem with the movie is the giant chunks of story that is taken out or changed. Apparently (so I’ve read anyway) director Chris Weitz was made to change a lot of the script because of its anti-Catholic and atheistic themes that are quite blatant in the book (despite Catholicism never actually being named in either).  Lyra’s world is run by the Magisterium who are conspiring to end tolerance and free inquiry. And I guess I understand this was done as to not anger the Catholic Church (although personally when people protest a movie it usually does better) so instead they angered the fans of the books.

For those who have only seen the film, please, please, please read the books. All of them. They are well written with layers and layers of plot, several wondrous storylines and have parts that will make you laugh and cry. Most of all they make you think. Something the movie was sorely lacking.

I’m not going to give away any of the plot because it really has so many elements, but if you haven’t read the book, go see the movie, enjoy its prettiness, then go read the books and discover the wonder and intrigue Pullman has created that is sorely lacking in the film.

Inanimate Lessons

 I’m by no means a natural born writer. I have to work at it. Just like any profession or sport, practice will, inevitably, make perfect (or near enough). When I started writing, I had an issue with length. I was young and didn’t know how to structure chapters, so my chapters ended up being a page long. I’d write ‘Chapter _’ at the top and write to the bottom. Once I hit the bottom of the page, that would be the end of the chapter. I eventually was able to expand my chapter lengths a little, but it still wasn’t enough. My books would have 50 + chapters and the story didn’t seem to progress very far at any one time. So, I set my self a task – write a book about ten people. Each chapter will be about one person and it will be ten pages long. You will never go back to that person, so whatever happens in that chapter will have to be resolved at the end. I thought it was a good way to push my boundaries and get good length writing practice.

The story was simple enough, a body is found dumped in a drain, a young person who’s wearing a red cape. Slowly the news spreads and each chapter is about each persons reaction to finding out. I called it ‘Bloody Cape’ after a Deftones song. One chapter had the police officer receiving the call and going out to investigate, another was a man bound to a wheel chair who worked at an Adult Store and closed the store to go and take a look. I never planned the characters, but came up with them while writing each chapter. I thought, ‘Ok, the deceased person is wearing a cape because there’s a local comic book artist who draws a comic with a red cape.’ So the next chapter was the artist finding out the person died looking like one of his characters. It was hard at first to keep the ball rolling, because usually, for me any way, the chapter will end itself and you know it’s time for the next chapter to come. But when you’re writing to a set of rules, you can’t stop. I had to force myself to keep going. By the end of the book, I found my chapters were exceeding the ten page limit. I got used to writing long chapters. The only down fall was, every book or short story I wrote after that was long and I had to learn to cut them back a little.

There is a Family Guy episode where they mock Stephen King. They ask him what his next book will be about and he looks around the room frantically trying to make something up on the spot. He picks a lamp. ‘How about a Lamp? OOooooOhhh!’ I thought this would be another good assignment to set myself. Could I write something scary using an inanimate object? What would be the least harmful thing I could think of and make it terrifying? I thought of a cardboard box. It’s simplistic, everyone has one tucked away in their garage, spare room, shed, etc. They’re mostly harmless and also collapsible. A baby could knock one flat. How could I make this the main subject of horror? I thought about the cardboard box and what it’s use for. Moving and storing. I thought, what if the box had kept a serial killers belongings in it while he was in a mental ward? What if it stored all his ‘trophies’ or personal belongings? Could some of his energy or ‘mojo’ seep into the box? Why not? Sounds plausible. I figured I would write a trilogy about the box. Three short stories centred around the same box and how it brings each owner agonizing horror and misfortune. I was going to call the trilogy The Murder Box, with each story in turn called The Gore Box, The Flesh Box and The Horror Box. The first story was a mother and her two children moving from one town to another to escape their abusive father. They leave the box in the spare room to unpack another day and go to bed. At midnight, when the house is quiet and dark, the lid opens up on its own and a black, charred hand reaches out of it from the darkness. The daughter gets out of bed to get a glass of water and walks past the room, the hand disappears. As her back is turned, a dark, shadowy figure dashes across the hallway in the next room. I never wrote the second story because I had an ending where a young man escaping the law crashes his car and the box is burnt to ash in the fire. The young man laying on the road, bleeding to death, watches all the demons and monsters spill from the box and burn.

I tried this assignment again with one of the first short stories I wrote that I was proud of called The Tape. The story was based around an elderly man living on his own named Leo. One stormy night there is a knock at his door and when he answers it, it’s his neighbour Joe who is looking frantic and horrified. Joe says that he is leaving and Leo asks why he’s taking off in the middle of the night in the pouring rain? Joe doesn’t answer, but instead asks him if he wants his old stereo. Leo takes it and Joes runs off into the hammering thunder and drives away. Leo leaves it on the table, not knowing what he’s going to do with it. Later that night he goes to the bathroom to take a bath and takes the stereo with him to listen to music. He finds a tape inside the cassette deck and plays it. It’s an interview by a psychiatrist and a schizophrenic patient who talks about see a little girl in a dress wearing a pure white mask. After a few haunted experiences, towards the end, Leo is in the bathtub holding a razor when the lights flicker in the bathroom. He looks to the doorway and sees the young girl with the white mask. She then pushes the stereo into the bathtub.

From constant practicing and experimenting, and also setting myself assignments, I can work on the areas I think I need to be better at.

NaNoWriMo is upon us and that is always a challenge and a good way to learn how to write. You push yourself to finish and sometimes that it what is needed to get it done. Because most of us aren’t published authors with agents breathing down our necks for the next book, we don’t have that push to finish and sometimes the book can get lost along the way and forgotten, and that’s always a shame. Finishing a book is a big deal for any writer. Some people may only finish one book in their writing lives, others may finish many.

Whenever I pick up a book at the book store, I’ll flick through it and if I see the chapters are short, it appeals to me more. Only because I don’t have that much time to read, and when I do it’s normally half an hour to an hour at the most. So if I know I can get a chapter or two done before bed, it makes me feel like I’m still sticking with the story and getting it read. Early Terry Pratchett books didn’t have chapters and it always made me apprehensive about reading them because I hate stopping the middle of a chapter or I’ll lose the flow of the story, but his recent books have chapters now, much to my relief.

Mitchell Tierney

 

Plan vs. Not Plan

There are two very different schools of thought when it comes to writing I’ve found – the planners and the free writers. This difference becomes widely apparent at this time of the year, especially in my house. That’s right folks; NaNoWriMo is once again upon us. For those who have no idea what I’m talking about, please see last year’s entry on NaNoWriMo here.

It has become a bit of mother-daughter rivalry at my place; as we both battle to beat each other on daily word counts, rushing to fit in writing a 50,000 word novel in 30 days while still holding down full-time day jobs and keeping the household running smoothly. Things get a bit crazy.

But it’s the lead up where the planning styles, or lack of, show themselves. My planning involves purchasing copious amounts of sugar free Redbull/V/*insert energy drink*, candy and food I can eat one handed. I am a free writer. This how I approach most my books. On November first I will be up at 4am to start writing and at this moment all I know is a general premise and my main protagonists name…  and that’s how I like it. For me planning a story makes me feel bogged down. It stifles my muse. I like to let my characters write themselves and take me on their stories like I’m merely a ghost writer for a group of fictional entities. Being made to write outlines for stories at school was hell for me. Most times though I had awesome English teachers who understood me and let me write my stories and then write a synopsis. (Thank you Mrs Morris)

And then there are writers like my mum. My mum, Mara Harrison, whose beautiful illustrations for the next Ouroborus Book Services’ book Everdark Realms can be seen at www.everdarkrealms.com, is a planner. She approaches her writing and art with surgical precision, planning meticulously every detail before even starting to write/draw. Watching her during NaNo is an experience. Whereas I sit typing on the couch, caffine in reach; she sits surrounded by notebooks and bits of paper. She stops at intervals to rifle through her papers, rustling away as my dog looks on perplexed from the safety of my side.

I guess deep down though our planning styles match our personalities to a tea. Although I like to know where I’m going in advance in life, I certainly am more of a head first, try it and see person. My mum on the other hand is a meticulous list maker. She’s very ordered and things don’t get left to chance. And they both work. We stare at each other in shock at the approach we each take to our writing, and life in general, but in the end, the goal is the same. We’re in it for the words and in the end, as another NaNo comes to a close we will both hopefully have our 50,000 words or more ready to be enhanced once the insanity dies down and I lower my caffine levels enough to actually sleep.

So my advice is do what works for you. Don’t get bullied into planning and mapping because it’s what is expected. Alternatively, if you are a planner, especially if surrounded by opinionated free writers, don’t feel that you’re planning is wrong or cheating. If it helps you to write and keeps you going, more power to it.

For those doing NaNo this year, good luck. Feel free to friend me. My name on the site is theravensclaw. Have Fun and happy NaNo-ing.

Book vs. Movie – The Mist by Stephen King

I was planning on writing about Planet of the Apes but I realised that I couldn’t remember most of the older movies so gimme a few weeks on that one. Now before I begin SPOILER WARNING. If you read through these book vs. movie columns and it spoils the ending of either then it is your own fault. Okay, now that that is over let us begin.

I was eight when I first experienced the joy and terror that is Stephen King. My mother was always pretty liberal on what I could watch and read (within reason of course) and she knew of my love for the odd, creepy and downright gross from an early age. At seven I had devoured most the Goosebumps books by RL Stine and by age eight or so I had moved onto Christopher Pike and other teen horror books. One night on a school holiday I was up late and watched the movie Cat’s Eye (which consisted of three short films: Quitters, Inc., The Ledge, and The General) and from that day I had to find more of this master’s works. Little did I know how much more I would love the books as my life progressed.

 I was around nine when I got my first Stephen King book, not having convinced mum to buy me any of my own just yet. I remember vividly that day mum and I went shopping with my aunt. We passed a second hand book store, that musty, dust smell wafting from the semi-lit doorway. I dragged at her hand, begging her to let us stop for a minute. Even at that age I was enthralled with the smell of old books. With a smile she let me run free into the stacks and overcrowded shelves. I emerged after a few minutes holding a thick paperback, its pages and cover dog eared and creased. The spine so bent you could barely read the title. Its cover held a cracked image of a skeleton holding a scythe and the title Skeleton Crew by Stephen King.

 It took a bit of convincing but I persuaded her to let me buy it with my pocket money for the pricely sum of $1.50 (that was a lot of money in 1991 especially for a nine year old). I started reading as soon as we got in the car and amongst all the gems there were two shining stars The Raft and one of the longer stories in the book, The Mist. I hoped to one day see either of them as movies so when they announced they were making The Mist  in 2007, I was stoked but apprehensive. I was a lot more discerning by that age and had seen how most of my idol’s books had been made into bad telemovies or just changed way too much.

 When I went to see it on the big screen it was at a small cinema with a few friends and the cinema was mostly empty as it was the end of the movie’s run. And I must admit I was pleasantly surprised. There were a few changes but only one that really split the King fans down the middle on opinion. I’ll get to that one soon.

 The Mist for those who haven’t seen/read it (seriously you should stop reading if you intend to) sees a thick, soupy mist begin to spread across the town of Bridgton, Maine, making it nigh on impossible to see more than a  few feet in front of you. In the movie the storm that brings the mist and the aftermath that leads to the story is very rushed through (albeit containing a an easter egg for King fans with a painting of a movie poster of Roland Deschain from the Dark Tower series), but the book, along with King’s usual demeanour, ambles along, showing the intricacies of the characters’ ‘normal’ lives. A tree has fallen in the storm and crushed the boathouse of our main character David Drayton (played in the movie by Thomas Jane) falling from his neighbour, Brent Norton’s  (Andre Braugher) yard. Despite the ill feelings between the two, they head into town for supplies together with David’s son Billy (Nathan Gamble).

Once at the store we meet a mixed group of people, from checkout chicks and bagboys, some soldiers from the military compound nearby working on a secret mission named the Arrowhead Project (the book hints at this being the cause of the mist, the soldiers following suicide being further hint of this. The movie straight up blames this project of ‘opening doors to other realms’ for the mist and the monsters from it – another Dark Tower reference perhaps), and the crazy Mrs Carmody. This is when stuff starts going pear shaped. Creatures start to attack from the mist.

I won’t give away too much of them away because it’s rather cool. But one of the other differences between the book and movie is Mrs Carmody. Although personally they both work well for me, the book Mrs Carmody is more strange crazy in the book than religious zealot crazy like in the movie. But as I said both work and by the end she had convinced most the people in the store that the mist is part of the end times and that God wants a blood sacrifice to appease him – in the form of David’s son, Billy. (For the fans: please note in the movie all the King paperbacks on the book shelves). Her getting taken down by a well aimed can of peas to the head certainly brought cheers to the people in our cinema.

Things happen more or less like in the book until the end, and this is the BIG change that personally pissed me off, but some fans loved it. In the book the end sees David, Billy, Amanda the checkout operator and an elderly, yet tough, school teacher Hilda Reppler, escaping in a car driving into the mist. The very last part reveals that they hear a single word come through the crackling radio, ‘Hartford’, giving them hope that there is something out there, and THAT’S IT. And I would love to have seen the movie end this way, but to placate the masses they gave it a ‘real’ ending.

There are still David, Billy and Amanda but swaps Hilda for Irene (same character as Hilda, just different name) and Dan. They drive over to David’s house to find his wife dead – victim to the creatures. Then they start driving away again. Eventually they run out of fuel and pull over. While Billy sleeps, they discuss their fate and with 4 bullets left in the gun David had they decide to end it, having not seen any other survivors on the way. David shoots Billy, Amanda, Irene and Dan and then resigns himself to the fate of the creatures ending his life. He steps out of the car when all of a sudden he hears the rumble of a truck. The mist begins to clear and he sees military personnel and survivors. He falls to the ground screaming realising how close they were to rescue and that his son and wife are now dead.

Yeah…

So my recommendation is read the book first. Get the Skeleton Crew book (because it’s full of awesome stories) and not the novelisation of the movie because it’s not the real deal.

Also if you’re new to Stephen King and his 1000 page epics of fear seem a little overwhelming, this is a great way to start, with bite size stories you can read in one sitting.

As for the movie, it’s good. Personally I stop it before the stupid ending so it’s more like the book but if you’re not a purist or you don’t intend to read the book, the movie is probably one of the better King adaptations.

~ Sabrina

 

 

 

Under the Influence

Whenever I read Chuck Palahniuk, my writing takes on his style; the minimalist writing with short chapters and grotesque subject matter. If I read Stephen King I feel like writing a long book, with deep characters with horror elements as well as supernatural themes. I get too influenced by what I read. A couple of Blogs back I was reading On the Road by Jack Kerouac and it had a profound impact on how that blog was written. It was disjointed, strange and had to be edited about five times before it made any sense. My girlfriend edited it and said it was hard to read and not my usual style, I told her I was harnessing the energy of Hunter S Thompson, Jack Kerouac and William S Burroughs.

I’ve always found it hard to find my own style of writing. I don’t really believe I’ve found my true, unique, style yet, strange as that sounds. Even though I have been writing for years and years, I am easily influenced by the book I read at that moment. I think this can be equal bad and good. A few of my books are heavily influenced by Cormac McCarthy; the way he describes things in great detail, heavy on the weather descriptions with a loose storyline and minimal characters. I like that way of writing, I love his books and find it very easy to write like that. Even if I’m not reading a book of his, I can sit down to one of my books that I’m working on, read a few lines and the style will flow right out. I can pick up exactly where I left off. With Chuck Palahniuk’s style, it’s a lot harder. I have to get one of his books from the book shelf, skim through it, remember the way he describes things, situations, people, environments and go ‘ah yes, that’s right,’ and sit down immediately to write. That should not be the way to write, I know.

The only way to figure out your own style, for me anyway, is to not read anything for a while. I’ve done it before, but it doesn’t happen very often as I’m always reading. I’ve sat at the computer raw, with no inspiration from other writers, no influence and I’ve written. What came out was my own style, uninhibited. Looking back at it now, I can see all the areas I need to work on. I can see where I faultier and where other peoples work was evident. It was clear that moving the character through settings, such as down a hallway, or into a haunted house was happening too quickly. I would describe it briefly and move as fast as I could. In my book S.P.O.O.K.S II – The Ghastly Ghost Train, I had the young brother and sister moving through a museum, down towards the basement to check on a mummy that had escaped. I remember them getting from the front of the museum to the basement in only a paragraph or two. I barely stopped to explain their surroundings, their feelings, or anything. It was pretty much walking along a corridor, looking at a specimen in a glass tube, getting in the elevator and heading down to the basement. Thinking back now, if, or when, I do a rewrite, I would try and build suspense up a little more than I did. I would take longer describing the scenery, and this I think I have learned from Stephen King and Cormac McCarthy. You could say it was a technique learnt, rather than imitating someone else’s style. On a rewrite I would have them sit in the car, at night, looking up at the museum with wide eyes, a full moon overhead, the caretaker shaking by the front stairs, holding a flashlight and stumbling over his words. I would make them walk to the basement, rather than get in an elevator, every step would echo and it would be dark, wherever they flash their torches they would see teeth and eyes of the museums exhibits.

Just recently I was writing Everdark Reals book two for the Aquillians and one of my characters is locked in a prison. He is told to look down the hallway at a large window (it makes more sense once you get to read it). And when I wrote it, I did exactly that, made him look down the corridor at the window. After thinking about it after a day or two, that one scene drew me back to the computer because I knew I had fallen into that same trap. I made it too simple, too uninteresting and boring and it was only one sentence. On the rewrite, I described the darkness of the hallway, the way the ground was made from cobblestones, the other cells along the walls and I made a rat with one ear scamper across the hallway and disappear through a hole. I could have said just a rat, but giving it only one ear, makes it a little more interesting. Giving the hallway mist and dripping moisture from the roof tiles gives you more of a clear picture, even if you only picture that one scene for three seconds.

I don’t think a writer can develop their own style without being influenced by what they read. I mean, that’s why we start writing in the first place. We read books that we love and think ‘I’d really like to do that,’ and once you start writing, you can’t stop. You could look at writers like Clive Barker’s writing and think that there is nothing overly unique about his writing. His words flow freely and it’s easy to read. You don’t get snagged on each sentence, like some writers. But the one thing that make Barker unique are his Monsters and settings. And this is his style. You read a Clive Cussler book  or Mathew Riley book, you know what you’re in for. You know their style, you know what to expect. When Stephen King tried to write under a pseudonym, everyone knew it was him, he couldn’t hide his style.

I tend to like writing kids/YA books because I thought they were more fun to write and they were something I would have liked to read as a kid. But now, I just think it’s closer to my style of writing than anything else.

Mitchell Tierney

WWSD (What Would Shakespeare Do)

I must admit I’m a bit of a Shakespeare nerd. I remember walking around at high school lugging around the school library’s only copy of The Complete Works of Shakespeare in my school bag. It was a monstrously sized, hard cover volume, bigger than a dictionary and I’m pretty sure if anyone tried to rob me I could have easily knocked them out with the weight of it. So when I was posed the question of what Shakespeare would think of Twilight, it got me thinking. The idea evolved even past that question and into what would Shakespeare do in today’s literary market.

 As for the original question, I’m sure Shakespeare would be amazed at how such sub standard rubbish could make so much money but, and if pains me to say it, Shakespeare could, if he were a modern writer, be churning out similar books himself.  His works would go one of three ways: amazing books, in depth television shows or tacky paperbacks.

 His tragic love stories would either be brilliant, heartrending tales like a Bryce Courtenay novel or, most likely, be mills and boon romances or turned into Neighbours or one of the cookie cutter dramas common on tv today. He was known as a writer for the masses and from emo poet to romance writer, I fear his work would most likely to the way of the supermarket paperback or television soap.

 Now don’t get me wrong. I certainly hope that if the bard were alive today the works he penned would be merely modern retellings of his works. Prose for the masses; his poetic nature being encapsulated in epics akin to Mr Courtenay’s extensive catalogue. We already see many of Shakespeare’s works being retold in contemporary settings so could we perhaps see a sparkly vampire ridden version of the Taming of the Shrew.

 I hope that if we ever get the ability to bring the past back to life and have Shakespeare able to fill our bookshelves with new works it will be more of the classic works. A Midsummer Nights Dream would work as an urban fantasy or even a True Blood-esqe tale for tv. But if we return to his probably best known and much misquoted work Romeo and Juliet you know this would end up being a teen romance or a Mills and Boon. Sure it could end up being a wistful saga akin to a Colleen McCullough but would marketing hold up for a relative new comer to this genre.

 But returning to the original question, Shakespeare, if writing classic tales would probably think Twilight is the badly written panty-wetting, tween market rubbish… either that or he’d be the author or adapting it for the small screen.

 

 

~Sabrina

A Spark That Starts a Fire

To all the writers out there, at what point do you think you have enough information to start writing a book? Can you write just off the one idea? Or do you have note books full of plot developments, characters, settings and creatures, before you start writing?

Personally, I have to have quite a bit of story line and ‘nagging’ before I put pen to paper (or fingers to keyboard). I normally start with a single idea. Most of the time it’s relatively small and made up of only a short scene or plot. About four days ago I had an idea about a group of kids who find an abandoned train hidden somewhere and they try to get it working. I thought, ‘hmm, that isn’t much of an idea, but… what else happens?’ Then I thought, ‘Why would they get this old train working?’ Could it be they all come from awful backgrounds – abuse, neglect, bullying and to escape their tormentors they meet at this train and get it working so they can leave their lives behind. I was so excited, because I could explore each kid’s background and really dig in deep and write some nasty stuff, exercising my writing skills and pushing my boundaries a little further than I’m used to. I sat down and wrote about two pages… and that was it.

I should have learnt from the past that that wasn’t enough information and I didn’t let it grow in my mind before starting to write. I don’t really have rules when it comes to starting books, just a few basic guidelines, and I’d like to go over a few here.

First off, the Idea. If I get an idea for a book, and I like it, or whatever powers that be think I should write it, it will stick. It will be like a thorn in my brain and I’ll find that I’m thinking about it a lot, at work, in the car, shopping. I’ll think of that one idea, then I’ll let it grow. For example, Heather Cassidy and the Magnificent Mr. Harlow – the idea was in my head, a girl whose father owns a circus and their magician has lost his magic. Fine, the idea is there, so what? Over the course of a few weeks the idea grew.

I call this stage the Incubation stage. It’s an egg, not much to it, pretty basic. I’ll keep a warm light on it and see what happens. Suddenly one day while sitting on the toilet or in the shower I think, ‘The magician’s daughter doesn’t believe in him anymore because he hurt her during a magic trick’. I think, ‘yeah, that’s good. He can’t do magic because his daughter doesn’t believe in him.’ Another piece of the puzzle is added. But still, not enough to write an entire book. Fast forward a week and while driving or at work, I’ll think, ‘maybe the daughter found another realm, another world where magic is bought and sold and she sold her father’s magic to stop him from doing it.’ Now I have some sort of plot and a few characters. I could start to write now, but more than likely I will stop because I don’t really have anywhere to go. When writing a book I need to have a vague idea of the ending, so I know where to write to. Or else it’s like aiming an arrow at nothing, you need a target. Sometimes I will brain storm, just to see what I come up with. Heather could find the ‘way’ to this other ‘world’ and become stranded. This gives me more characters, an entire world to imagine and make up, and it can take me away from the first part of the story. Heather could be trapped in this world and find people who know about selling magic and help her, at a price. She could join a battle with the ‘rebels’ and break into the ‘evil magicians’ tower to retrieve the magic and get back to her home world, but will she make it? What about the ending? She confronts the Evil magician, and he tells her Mr. Harlow’s daughter sold the magic to him, there’s a fight, she gets back to her home world, just in time and confronts the daughter. She ‘believes’ in him again, his magic is restored and she joins him on stage for a magic show. Her father is almost in tears that he has his daughter ‘back’ and they perform a grand magic trick. The end. Seems simple and basic, and that’s what an outline should be. All I have to do now is join the dots.

I’ve been writing non-stop for about five years, so I’ve always got at least two things on the go. If it’s Everdark stuff, or my adult books, or comic scripts or whatnot, I find that I don’t really have the time to start new books unless I can finish old ones. At the point that Mr. Harlow came about, I didn’t have too much writing stuff that was drawing me to my desk to write. I was rewriting an old book and had lost interest. And here in lies the ‘nagging’ part. Mr. Harlow nagged me. It wanted to get written. I would think about it, think of the world I had to invent, what would it be like? What would the circus be like? What happen to Heather’s mother? How does she get back? Then one day I decided I would sit down and start it. I had the plot, some characters and the time. I thought, ‘Ok, I’ll start writing this, but I’ll write it quickly,’ as I figure Heather Cassidy and the Magnificent Mr. Harlow would never get published. I had no plan on sending it to any publishers until one day, in the future, if someone asked to publish something from me, then, maybe, I would show it to them. I was writing it because I love to write, and if I didn’t put it down, the nagging would continue until I did.

I had a set plan, write quickly, and aim for about 120 pages. Don’t edit it, or maybe edit once, fast, and then leave it. I would move onto the next project, as I’ve started to get the nagging for another book. Sometimes to keep the writing beast in the basement, I’ll write a short story. This way I can get that one idea that never comes to fruition, and write it down. I had an idea about a father and son who drive around the long streets near their home town and pick up lost treasure on the high way that people either leave behind, or throw out their window. One day they come across a cardboard box that has a head in it. Not enough for a book, but enough for about four pages of a short story. Another story I had was an elderly woman who is alone and speaks to spirits through her voice recorder. Not much, but in the end you see she has piles and piles of tapes, all recordings of conversations with ghosts in her house. I haven’t written this one yet, but every few weeks I get the photo-like image in my mind of the old woman sitting in the small, damp, kitchen clutching the recorder in her hands, asking if the ghosts are there.

Sometimes a spark can cause a fire, a wildfire. I’ve spent years thinking about a series of books off one idea. Then again, sometimes I’ve written a paragraph off one idea and the fuel tank ran dry. I’m writing Mr. Harlow because I have the time in my writing schedule. I have Everdark Realms to write, but I have a while to do that, I have my adult book Hexagram that I work on every now and again, piecing it together slowly. I had the entire plot for Mr. Harlow, knew it would be fun to write and was motivated. Once I’m in a few chapters, and the ball is rolling so to speak, I don’t usually stop.

Usually, about a third of the way through writing a book I’ll hit a wall. This wall feels like mud, or quick sand, or like trying to run in water. When I was writing Monster Detention I hit the wall badly. That book is 466 pages long, the longest book I’ve ever written. At about page 300 I got the writing blues, badly. I lost all motivation to write it, I knew exactly where to go, what had to be done and it became too predictable. Every time I sat down to write it I felt depressed, every fibre of my being wanted to write something else, anything else but this. Looking back, I think I may have been apprehensive about finishing it. It’s a long book, one that I planned out, wrote notes, researched, was happy with the characters, connected with them and it was coming to an end. Maybe a part of me didn’t want it to end? This three-quarters-of-the-way-through wall happens every time. It’s that bit of the book were there’s a lot of explaining and dialogue and not much action. The calm before the storm. I knew it was coming with Mr. Harlow and I thought if I hit this wall, I may not recover. I may not finish it, and I wanted to. I don’t often get that far into a book and abandon it. So, I saw the wall coming up, I was anticipating it and I had a plan. I would hit the wall full speed, write through the mud and sludge, get all the dialogue and explanation out of the way, like they do in movies, and move straight on to the action packed ending. I didn’t want to glance over the important reveal or story, but I didn’t want to get bogged down with explanation. It was hard, but I think I did it. I hope it doesn’t sound too rushed or weakened by restricting it to just one chapter. Now, Mr. Harlow is primed right at the gates of the evil Emperor’s domain and there’s nothing but action and suspense to write. I’m excited now to write it, and when I do find an hour or two to sit and write it, I know it will come out fast and furious and it’ll be fun.

 

Mitchell Tierney

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 143 other followers